<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Crazy Or Genius?: Tag javascript</title>
    <link>http://www.crazyorgenius.com/articles/tag/javascript?tag=javascript</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>When You Are Right 90% Of The Time, Why Quible Over The Remaining 3%?</description>
    <item>
      <title>Cell Phone Shopping And The Tale Of The Really Old Javascript</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every so often, a friend of mine asks me why I don&amp;#8217;t have a cell phone. I usually tell them how most cell phones cause feedback with my implant, either when I try to talk at them (feedback with the headset), or when placed near the processor (rare, but it recently happened with a Blackberry. Funnily enough, I could make calls with the Blackberry) and then the conversation moves on. Recently, however, a friend of mine came up with a solution (of sorts). He asked why I didn&amp;#8217;t just get a phone and a text message plan. Then it doesn&amp;#8217;t matter if I can&amp;#8217;t make a call, I can still text people on the go.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Armed with this idea, I started to look around a bit. Shopping around on Telus, I stumbled upon the following while trying to add a service to my package: http://www.mytelusmobility.com/sslerror.html&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Wow, interesting reccomended browsers. &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IE4&lt;/span&gt;? Netscape 4? &lt;span class="caps"&gt;AOL 4&lt;/span&gt;? Also, consider that Opera has had 128 bit encryption support since 3.0 (which I believe was before the year 2000), and Telus isn&amp;#8217;t recognizing it. I wonder just how Telus is deciding if a browser supports 128 bit encryption. Seems to be a Javascript function&amp;#8230;..  (http://www.telusmobility.com/js/webapps.js) Hmmm&amp;#8230;. looking at mytm_crosslinks (which is the function being called) it seems to check &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SSL&lt;/span&gt; compatibility based on browser version. And completely ignoring anything not IE or Netscape.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Well, I guess at least they are descriminating against all alternative browsers equally&amp;#8230; though I wonder why they decided to write their own browser checking function (complete with redundant checks) rather than&amp;#8230;. use one of the wildly available ones. Actually, given that they reccomend IE/Netscape 4, I wonder just how old this function is anyway, and why they are still using it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:23:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b4776691-9f01-4b43-b71d-1d6eef33d3ac</guid>
      <author>Sean</author>
      <link>http://www.crazyorgenius.com/articles/2007/08/27/cell-phone-shopping-and-the-tale-of-the-really-old-javascript</link>
      <category>telus</category>
      <category>error</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
